Charles Richard Scotcher and Charles Bayliss
Charles Richard Scotcher was born 22 March 1851 in Clarendon Street, Somerstown, London. His parents were Charles and Elizabeth (formerly Johnson) Scotcher from Shoreditch. Charles is important to the family history because in 1884 he married Elizabeth Ann Bayliss who, as we saw earlier, was the first of our Bayliss family to be born in London. The couple shared their home with Charles Bayliss at 135 Marlborough Road, Upper Holloway, London N.19. Charles and Elizabeth would remain childless but their influence in family financial and legal matters seems to have been extensive. As a builder, Charles Richard formed a close working relationship with his father-in-law and became on Charles Bayliss's death in 1898 his executor, responsible for administering his will which included a surpringly large property portfolio.
Elizabeth Ann Bayliss married Charles R.
Scotcher in 1884
Elizabeth Ann died in 1907 and her husband remarried in to Amelia Maxwell at Upper Holloway Baptist Church and they moved to Crayford in Kent. There is in a codicil to his will an indication of a reversal of fortune that eventually led to his return to the property at 135 Marlborough Road were he died in 1928.
135 Marlborough Road (and the adjoining property at 137, also owned by Charles Bayliss) stood next door to thePrince Alfred public house and were demolished in the late 1960's. The site is now the entrance to a council estate.
135 Marlborough Road (and the adjoining property at 137, also owned by Charles Bayliss) stood next door to thePrince Alfred public house and were demolished in the late 1960's. The site is now the entrance to a council estate.
Where on earth did you get that picture of Elizabeth?
ReplyDeleteI like the way this is coming together, I didn't think any of this would ever be collated in this way!
Fascinating.
Very distant relatives seem to come up with more photographs than close relatives ever do! I have actually published this picture before in my original "Bayliss Connection" where a lot of the text has also been seen before. You did have a copy!
ReplyDelete